From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Klassert Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Add IPsec virtual tunnel interfaces to IPv6 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:26:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20130819062623.GN26773@secunet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:34869 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750865Ab3HSG0Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:26:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEBB1A007E for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:26:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id c8UQ-5-UIvUr for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:26:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-srv1.secumail.de (unknown [10.53.40.200]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3964C1A007A for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:26:23 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This patchset adds support for IPsec virtual tunnel interfaces to IPv6. IPsec virtual tunnel interfaces provide a routable interface for IPsec tunnel endpoints. This does not add any tunnel headers, it uses the generic xfrm tunneling. It just provides an interface for xfrm IPv6 tunnels, like the IPv4 side does. It has not much testing yet, I can setup the interface and ping through it. Review and further testing is very wellcome. I'll send the necessary iproute2 patches in a separate thread.