From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: question about drivers/net/ethernet/sgi Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:16:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20130822131617.GZ2163@linux-mips.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Julia Lawall Return-path: Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([78.24.191.182]:43984 "EHLO cvs.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752123Ab3HVNQW (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:16:22 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:46284 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6852084Ab3HVNQVC3IY8 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:16:21 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:43:32PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > The files in drivers/net/ethernet/sgi (meth.c and ioc3-eth.c) both use > alloc_skb. Is there a reason why they do not use netdev_alloc_skb, like > most other ethernet drivers? netdev_alloc_skb is such newfangled (2.6.19) interface - and both of these drivers date back to the 2.3 days. So the answer is, nobody bothered so far. Ralf