From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Source routing without rules?
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 03:51:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130828015158.GA1741@order.stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWSgSnMdARZPGii5G1Yf43JjEPpeNgL2_yfDBd7W9650A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 06:46:35PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> <hannes@stressinduktion.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:16:21PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> I'm about to implement a trivial source routing policy for the third
> >> time, and this is IMO stupid. I want to have two routes to a network.
> >> Each route should specify a src, and, if the flow matches the src,
> >> then that route should win.
> >>
> >> The rules that don't work are:
> >>
> >> ip route add <net> via <gw1> dev <dev1> metric 0
> >> ip route add <net> via <gw2> dev <dev2> src <dev2addr> metric 10
> >
> > src is actually the preferred src address. In ipv6 land there is a RTA_SRC
> > (look for ip route *from* parameter) route attribute settable to only
> > select routes if the from-source matches the route. If you implement
> > such a feature I would go with the same design (IPV6_SUBTREES).
>
> Interesting. The Kconfig help text for IPV6_SUBTREES is incredibly
> confusing. What are the actual semantics? I'm guessing that only
> routes that match the source address in their "from" clause are
> considered and ties are broken in favor of the longest from prefix.
At first normal longest-prefix lookup is done with the destination
address. The resulting fib6_node can now hold a subtree where a source
lookup will be done. If a node matches, this is the result. Otherwise
backtracking takes place in the "main" fib6_table.
Greetings,
Hannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-28 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-28 0:16 Source routing without rules? Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-28 0:57 ` Brian Haley
2013-08-28 1:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-28 1:14 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-08-28 1:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-28 1:51 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130828015158.GA1741@order.stressinduktion.org \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox