netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 5/9] bonding: convert bond_has_this_ip() to use upper devices
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:00:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130828120024.GH1992@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130827181001.GD24836@redhat.com>

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 08:10:01PM +0200, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
...snip...
>3) Adding lower_dev_list, populating it accordingly, and also adding an int
>distance to the netdev_upper (or, with this approach, rather netdev_adjacent
>or something like that), which will help to implement your idea - a device
>will have lower/upper_dev_list populated with all lower/upper devices and
>their distance (i.e. distance == 1 means that it's first level of
>lower/upper device). With this approach, we might also afterwards get rid
>of slave lists from 'grouping' devices like bonding/team/bridge/etc. and,
>thus, the locking.

Just FYI, I've taken this approach in the next version, seems to (suddenly)
work fine, FWIW...

I'll send the v2 in few minutes.

Thanks again!

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-28 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-26 20:32 [PATCH net-next v1 0/9] bonding: remove vlan special handling Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/9] net: add netdev_upper_get_next_dev(dev, iter) Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:57   ` Jiri Pirko
2013-08-27 10:42     ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/9] net: add netdev_for_each_upper_dev() Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/9] bonding: use netdev_upper list in bond_vlan_used Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 4/9] bonding: make bond_arp_send_all use upper device list Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 5/9] bonding: convert bond_has_this_ip() to use upper devices Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:53   ` Jiri Pirko
2013-08-27 11:16     ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-27 11:25       ` Jiri Pirko
2013-08-27 11:53         ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-27 18:10         ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-28 12:00           ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2013-08-28 14:56           ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-28 16:32             ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 6/9] bonding: use vlan_uses_dev() in __bond_release_one() Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 7/9] bonding: split alb_send_learning_packets() Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 8/9] bonding: make alb_send_learning_packets() use upper dev list Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 9/9] bonding: remove vlan_list/current_alb_vlan Veaceslav Falico

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130828120024.GH1992@redhat.com \
    --to=vfalico@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).