From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 18/21] net: add a function to get the next/prev private
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:10:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130903081034.GC1437@minipsycho.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378157965-17537-19-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>
Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:39:22PM CEST, vfalico@redhat.com wrote:
>The boolean flag specifies which direction to go.
>
>CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
>CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
>CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
>---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 ++
> net/core/dev.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>index bde2244..a112ccc 100644
>--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>@@ -2835,6 +2835,8 @@ extern void *netdev_lower_dev_get_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
> struct net_device *lower_dev);
> extern void *netdev_lower_dev_get_private(struct net_device *dev,
> struct net_device *lower_dev);
>+extern void *netdev_lower_dev_get_next_private(struct net_device *dev,
>+ void *private, bool prev);
> extern int skb_checksum_help(struct sk_buff *skb);
> extern struct sk_buff *__skb_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
> netdev_features_t features, bool tx_path);
>diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>index 6df11a0..c694059 100644
>--- a/net/core/dev.c
>+++ b/net/core/dev.c
>@@ -5163,6 +5163,30 @@ void *netdev_lower_dev_get_private(struct net_device *dev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_lower_dev_get_private);
>
>+extern void *netdev_lower_dev_get_next_private(struct net_device *dev,
>+ void *private, bool prev)
^^^^^^^^^^^
Please rather do this in 2 functions
Next should return next, not previous...
>+{
>+ struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
>+
>+ list_for_each_entry(lower, &dev->neighbour_dev_list.lower, list)
>+ if (lower->private == private)
>+ break;
>+
>+ if (&lower->list == &dev->neighbour_dev_list.lower)
>+ return NULL;
>+
>+ lower = prev ? list_entry(lower->list.prev, struct netdev_adjacent, list) :
>+ list_entry(lower->list.next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
>+ if (&lower->list != &dev->neighbour_dev_list.lower)
>+ return lower->private;
>+
>+ lower = prev ? list_entry(lower->list.prev, struct netdev_adjacent, list) :
>+ list_entry(lower->list.next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
>+
>+ return lower->private;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_lower_dev_get_next_private);
>+
> static void dev_change_rx_flags(struct net_device *dev, int flags)
> {
> const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
>--
>1.8.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-02 21:39 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/21] bonding: use neighbours instead of own lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 01/21] net: add neighbour_dev_list to save only neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-03 8:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-09-03 8:34 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 02/21] net: add RCU variant to search for netdev_adjacent link Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 03/21] net: add netdev_adjacent->private and allow to use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 04/21] net: expose the master link to sysfs, and remove it from bond Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 05/21] vlan: link the upper neighbour only after registering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 06/21] net: create sysfs symlinks for neighbour devices Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-03 7:48 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-09-03 8:05 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 07/21] bonding: add bond_has_slaves() and use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 08/21] bonding: convert bond_has_slaves() to use the neighbour list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 09/21] bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 10/21] bonding: modify bond_get_slave_by_dev() to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 11/21] bonding: remove bond_for_each_slave_reverse() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 12/21] net: add for_each iterators through neighbour lower link's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 13/21] bonding: make bond_for_each_slave() use lower neighbour's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 14/21] net: add netdev_for_each_lower_neigh_private_continue() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 15/21] bonding: use neighbour list for bond_for_each_slave_continue() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 16/21] net: add a possibility to get private from netdev_adjacent->list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 17/21] bonding: convert first/last slave logic to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 18/21] net: add a function to get the next/prev private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-03 8:10 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 19/21] bonding: use neighbours for bond_next/prev_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 20/21] bonding: use bond_for_each_slave() in bond_uninit() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-02 21:39 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 21/21] bonding: remove slave lists Veaceslav Falico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130903081034.GC1437@minipsycho.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).