From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Sacren Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: tcp: fix potential use after free in tcp_v6_do_rcv Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:51:57 -0600 Message-ID: <20130904005157.GG8262@mail.gmail.com> References: <1378229352-9779-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <1378230513.7360.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130903194620.GE8262@mail.gmail.com> <1378240517.7360.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130903215915.GF8262@mail.gmail.com> <1378247352.7360.50.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Daniel Borkmann , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, Jiri Benc To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:34011 "EHLO mail-pb0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761445Ab3IDAyZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 20:54:25 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rp2so6764236pbb.28 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1378247352.7360.50.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:29:12 -0700 > > On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 15:59 -0600, Jean Sacren wrote: > > From: Eric Dumazet > > Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:35:17 -0700 > > > > > > How did you get your conclusion ? > > > > If one changes one line of code, doesn't one own that line? > > > > 'Owning' like he is the guy who can sell it ? OK I understand now > so many people send 'cleanups' ;) 'Owning' like he is the guy who is responsible for the change. Whether you understand it or not, that's your own business. The idea was by taking one example to determine who is really to blame for: Is the one passing on the bug responsible? Thanks to Daniel Borkmann for the answer. -- Jean Sacren