From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Benc Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: tcp: fix potential use after free in tcp_v6_do_rcv Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 08:26:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20130904082639.5c5e3bb4@griffin> References: <1378229352-9779-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <1378230513.7360.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130903194620.GE8262@mail.gmail.com> <1378240517.7360.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130903215915.GF8262@mail.gmail.com> <1378247352.7360.50.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130904005157.GG8262@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , Daniel Borkmann , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org To: Jean Sacren Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44623 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761946Ab3IDG0y (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2013 02:26:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130904005157.GG8262@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:51:57 -0600, Jean Sacren wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:29:12 -0700 > > > > On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 15:59 -0600, Jean Sacren wrote: > > > From: Eric Dumazet > > > Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:35:17 -0700 > > > > > > > > How did you get your conclusion ? > > > > > > If one changes one line of code, doesn't one own that line? > > > > > > > 'Owning' like he is the guy who can sell it ? OK I understand now > > so many people send 'cleanups' ;) > > 'Owning' like he is the guy who is responsible for the change. Whether > you understand it or not, that's your own business. > > The idea was by taking one example to determine who is really to blame > for: Is the one passing on the bug responsible? Thanks to Daniel > Borkmann for the answer. Eric is correct, the bug was introduced by me. Sorry for it. Daniel, thanks for fixing it. Acked-by: Jiri Benc -- Jiri Benc