From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: netlink: filter particular protocols from analyzers Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 12:44:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20130905124437.6b3e14ad@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <1378396127-8342-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <20130905.144442.2085221662776542385.davem@davemloft.net> <20130905115755.7aec533c@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20130905.150341.1090416835512463609.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dborkman@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dborkmann@redhat.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:55171 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756890Ab3IETok (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:44:40 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id kq13so2332901pab.39 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:44:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130905.150341.1090416835512463609.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:03:41 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:57:55 -0700 > > > If you want filtering, why not add BPF (sk_filter) support to this? > > That's one idea. > > But using sk_protocol is at least consistent with how AF_PACKET does > things. Why not both.