From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fix NULL pointer dereference in br_handle_frame Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:18:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20130912.151855.2190474215627495241.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1378988195-2710-1-git-send-email-zhiguohong@tencent.com> <1379001428-2727-1-git-send-email-zhiguohong@tencent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vyasevic@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, zhiguohong@tencent.com To: honkiko@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:37015 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752855Ab3ILTS6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:18:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1379001428-2727-1-git-send-email-zhiguohong@tencent.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Hong Zhiguo Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:57:08 +0800 > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb) > int br_handle_frame_finish(struct sk_buff *skb) > { > const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest; > - struct net_bridge_port *p = br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev); > + enet_bridge_port *p = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler_data); You did not even compile test this patch. This is a good way to make people not want to review your work at all, because if you don't care enough to even compile test your patch why should other people care enough to look at it?