From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: mvneta: oops in __rcu_read_lock on mirabox Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:39:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20130916163937.GC3188@1wt.eu> References: <20130915205701.5c61a444@skate> <20130916065047.GH27487@1wt.eu> <20130916175152.4e013457@skate> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ezequiel Garcia , Gregory =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Ethan Tuttle Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 09:35:16AM -0700, Ethan Tuttle wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Thomas Petazzoni > wrote: > > Willy, Ethan, > > > > On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:50:47 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > >> I'm currently testing on 3.11.1 (which I had here) and am not getting > >> any issue after 50M packets. My kernel is running in thumb mode and > >> without SMP. > >> > >> Ethan, we'll need your config I guess. > > > > Can both of you also report the U-Boot version you're using, and the > > SoC revision (it's visible in the U-Boot output). > > Mine says: > > U-Boot 2009.08 (Sep 16 2012 - 22:50:06)Marvell version: 1.1.2 NQ > SoC: MV6710 A1 I just checked on my old captures and I have the same here, with more details such as the CPU's revision (Rev 1) : http://1wt.eu/articles/mirabox-vs-guruplug/ Willy