From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/6] bonding: remove the counter and simplify bond_for_each_slave_from()
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:10:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130925101016.GA23575@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5242B25F.7020505@huawei.com>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:52:31PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>Restructure the bond_for_each_slave_from(),
>remove the checking for bond->slave_cnt,
>make the new loop be more simple and racy.
The whole bond_for_each_slave_from() should be removed and replaced with a
standard bond_for_each_slave() - which is already in the process:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/277701/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/277717/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/277716/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/277702/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/277703/
After that we're ready to use the standard and less painful
list_for_each_entry() analogue - bond_for_each_slave() - which can
afterwards be easily RCUified by just replacing bond_for_each_slave() with
bond_for_each_slave_rcu().
>
>Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
>Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
>Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
>Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 3 +--
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>index f428ef57..4813dc6 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>@@ -383,7 +383,6 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
> struct slave *rx_slave, *slave, *start_at;
>- int i = 0;
>
> if (bond_info->next_rx_slave)
> start_at = bond_info->next_rx_slave;
>@@ -392,7 +391,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
>
> rx_slave = NULL;
>
>- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, start_at) {
>+ bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, start_at) {
> if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) {
> if (!rx_slave) {
> rx_slave = slave;
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 55bbb8b..fbe25bc 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -782,7 +782,6 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> struct slave *new_active, *old_active;
> struct slave *bestslave = NULL;
> int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
>- int i;
>
> new_active = bond->curr_active_slave;
>
>@@ -801,7 +800,7 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> /* remember where to stop iterating over the slaves */
> old_active = new_active;
>
>- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, i, old_active) {
>+ bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, old_active) {
> if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
> return new_active;
> } else if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_BACK &&
>@@ -2756,7 +2755,6 @@ do_failover:
> static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> struct slave *slave, *next_slave;
>- int i;
>
> read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>
>@@ -2788,7 +2786,7 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
>
> /* search for next candidate */
> next_slave = bond_next_slave(bond, bond->current_arp_slave);
>- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, next_slave) {
>+ bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, next_slave) {
> if (IS_UP(slave->dev)) {
> slave->link = BOND_LINK_BACK;
> bond_set_slave_active_flags(slave);
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>index eb36f57..e5734ad 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>@@ -130,9 +130,9 @@
> *
> * Caller must hold bond->lock
> */
>-#define bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, pos, cnt, start) \
>- for (cnt = 0, pos = start; pos && cnt < (bond)->slave_cnt; \
>- cnt++, pos = bond_next_slave(bond, pos))
>+#define bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, pos, start) \
>+ for (pos = start; pos; (pos = bond_next_slave(bond, pos)) != start ? \
>+ (pos) : (pos = NULL))
>
> /**
> * bond_for_each_slave - iterate over all slaves
>--
>1.8.0
>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 9:52 [PATCH net-next v5 5/6] bonding: remove the counter and simplify bond_for_each_slave_from() Ding Tianhong
2013-09-25 10:10 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130925101016.GA23575@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).