From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding the skb
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:16:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130926211648.GB1228@open-mesh.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130926141021.3cde0f0f@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3479 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:10:21PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 22:19:50 +0200
> Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>
> >
> > Even if enslaving a bridge interface into another bridge is
> > forbidden, it is still possible to create a chain of
> > virtual interfaces including two distinct bridges.
> >
> > In this case, the skb entering the second bridge could have
> > the nf_bridge field already set due to a previous operation
> > and consequently lead to a wrong processing of the packet
> > itself.
> >
> > To prevent this behaviour release and set to NULL the
> > nf_bridge field of the skb when exiting the bridge interface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>
> > ---
> >
> > I am not sure if this is a wanted behaviour or a real BUG. I found this
> > "misbehaviour" while testing batman-adv with the following configuration:
> >
> > - br0 (bridge interface) having bat0 and eth0 as slaves
> > - bat0 (which is a virtual interface provided by the batman-adv module and that
> > works similarly to a bridge - to some extends) having br1 as slave
> > - br1 (second bridge interface) having eth1 as slave
> >
> > Then follow these events:
> > - a broadcast packet arrives on eth0
> > - the skb enters br0 and skb->nf_bridge gets initialised and used
> > - the skb enters bat0 and the packet *gets encapsulated in the batman-adv packet
> > which adds a batman-adv header and another Ethernet header*
> > - the skb enters br1 and gets ruined because nf_bridge_maybe_copy_header() (in
> > br_dev_queue_push_xmit()) will try to restore an header that does not make
> > sense anymore.
> >
> > With this patch the nf_bridge gets de-initialised before exiting br0 and
> > therefore it is processed properly inside br1: nf_bridge_maybe_copy_header()
> > does not take place at all because nf_bridge is never initialised (the packet is
> > non-IP since it is a batman-adv packet)
> >
> > To the developers of the bridge module I would like to ask:
> > 1) is skb->nf_bridge allowed to be non NULL when entering br_dev_xmit() ? If so,
> > when is this supposed to happen?
> >
> > 2) do you think this patch is logically correct but the nf_bridge release should
> > be done in batman-adv since it is the one re-encapsulating the packet?
> >
> >
> > I hope I have made the problem clear.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> > net/bridge/br_forward.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> > index 4b81b14..65864bc 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > } else {
> > skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> > br_drop_fake_rtable(skb);
> > +
> > + /* clean the NF bridge data */
> > + nf_bridge_put(skb->nf_bridge);
> > + skb->nf_bridge = NULL;
> > +
> > dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> > }
> >
Regarding CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER you are right, thanks.
>
> I think the header will also be garbage if bridge on bridge with netfilter is used.
> See nf_bridge_save_header.
What header are you referring to? nf_bridge_save_header() saves the header in
skb->nf_bridge->data, which is freed during nf_bridge_put() (assuming
->use reached 0).
--
Antonio Quartulli
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 20:19 [RFC net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding the skb Antonio Quartulli
2013-09-26 21:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-09-26 21:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-09-26 21:16 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2013-09-26 21:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-09-26 22:01 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-14 22:20 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-14 22:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-10-14 22:35 ` Antonio Quartulli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130926211648.GB1228@open-mesh.com \
--to=antonio@open-mesh.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).