From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] ll_temac: Reset dma descriptors on ndo_open Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 02:01:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20131001.020134.756782177490714135.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1380281068-13269-1-git-send-email-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> <20130930.212153.531876068589922786.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: joe@perches.com, jg1.han@samsung.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, wfp5p@virginia.edu, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:43212 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751008Ab3JAGBi (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 02:01:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:46:31 +0200 > What if I move > lp->tx_bd_ci = 0; > lp->tx_bd_next = 0; > lp->tx_bd_tail = 0; > lp->rx_bd_ci = 0; > > to temac_dma_bd_init? Will this be more correct? Yes, that would be a lot better.