From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Triplett Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 0/14] Sparse-related updates for 3.13 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 23:53:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20131012065326.GG15339@leaf> References: <20131011231659.GA28062@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, fengguang.wu@intel.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, davem@davemloft.net, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tgraf@suug.ch, gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, linville@tuxdriver.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net To: "Paul E. McKenney" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131011231659.GA28062@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:16:59PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Changes from v2: > > o Switch from rcu_assign_pointer() to ACCESS_ONCE() given that > the pointers are all --rcu and already visible to readers, > as suggested by Eric Dumazet and Josh Triplett. Hang on a moment. Do *none* of these cases need write memory barriers? - Josh Triplet