From: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
av1474@comtv.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: bpf jit: x86: optimize choose_load_func error path
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 04:55:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131014025535.GA1870@hp530> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381682194.3392.42.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 09:36:34AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 16:54 +0200, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> > Macro CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC returns handler for "any offset" if checks for K
> > were not passed. At the same time handlers for "any offset" cases make
> > the same checks against r_addr at run-time, that will always lead to
> > bpf_error.
> >
> > Run-time checks are still necessary for indirect load operations, but
> > error path for absolute and mesh loads are worth to optimize during bpf
> > compile time.
>
> I don't get the point.
>
> What real world use case or problem are you trying to handle ?
>
> bpf_error returns 0, so it seems your patch does the same.
>
> A buggy BPF program should not expect us to 'save' a few cycles.
>
>
>
Hi Eric!
There is no real world use case for me - it was eliminated by plain code
reading. The patch is not supposed to change behavior of BPF program - only
optimization of the error path.
I agree with, you there is no significant reason for optimizations of rarely
used pice of code. However, it is not only saving pipeline cycles and I-cache
lines for usually "never taken" branch. In case this "never taken" branch is a
buggy part of BPF program, we can avoid extra instructions and save space for
the rest of BPF program - there is no need to care about seen flags of buggy
part anymore.
Anyway, if you still think it's not good enough - just throw it away ;)
Thanks
Vladimir
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-14 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 16:31 [PATCH 1/3] net: bpf jit: ppc: optimize choose_load_func error path Vladimir Murzin
2013-10-08 22:50 ` Jan Seiffert
2013-10-13 14:26 ` Vladimir Murzin
[not found] ` <1381249910-17338-2-git-send-email-murzin.v@gmail.com>
2013-10-11 18:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: bpf jit: x86: " David Miller
2013-10-13 14:21 ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-10-13 14:25 ` malc
2013-10-13 14:31 ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-10-13 14:54 ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-10-13 14:54 ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-10-13 16:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-14 2:55 ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131014025535.GA1870@hp530 \
--to=murzin.v@gmail.com \
--cc=av1474@comtv.ru \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).