From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fib_trie: Send RTM_DELROUTE when link goes down Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:19:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20131017.161955.793695802575716229.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1382028894-14236-1-git-send-email-kristian.evensen@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ja@ssi.bg, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: kristian.evensen@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:46938 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762532Ab3JQUUC (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:20:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Kristian Evensen Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:11:39 +0200 > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Julian Anastasov wrote: >> IIRC, such notifications were not implemented >> to avoid storms to routing daemons. Not sure if this is >> still true. > > Thanks for letting me know. I was wondering if this was the case, but > then I saw that the deletion of IPv6 routes are announced (when > running "ip link set dev X down") and assumed that message storms was > (is?) not considered a problem. I really wish IPV6 wouldn't be inconsistent and behave that way.