From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] ipv6: Use destination address determined by IPVS
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 00:39:22 +0200
Message-ID: <20131019223922.GI31333@order.stressinduktion.org>
References: <1381881751-6719-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310180153250.4554@ssi.bg> <20131018021008.GH18135@order.stressinduktion.org> <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310191919290.1469@ssi.bg> <20131019183433.GC31333@order.stressinduktion.org> <20131019223657.GH31333@order.stressinduktion.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?utf-8?B?5ZCJ6Jek6Iux5piO?=
	<yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brooks <mark@loadbalancer.org>,
	Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
Return-path: <lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131019223657.GH31333@order.stressinduktion.org>
Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:36:57AM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> The more I review the patch the more I think it is ok. But we could actually
> try to just always return rt6i_gateway, as we should always be handed a cloned
> rt6_info where the gateway is already filled in, no?

Ergh, this seems to break loopback then.