Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] bonding: patchset for rcu use in bonding

[Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:58:36PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>Hi:
>
>The Patch Set will remove the invalid lock for bond work queue and replace it
>with rtnl lock, as read lock for bond could not protect slave list any more.

rtnl lock is a lot more expensive than bond lock, and not only for bond,
but for all the networking stack.

Why is the bond->lock invalid? It correctly protects slaves from being
modified concurrently.

I don't see the point in this patchset.

>
>Ding Tianhong (5):
>  bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_mii_monitor()
>  bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_alb_monitor()
>  bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_loadbalance_arp_mon()
>  bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_activebackup_arp_mon()
>  bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_3ad_state_machine_handler()
>
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c  |   9 ++--
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c  |  20 ++------
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 100 +++++++++++++---------------------------
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
>-- 
>1.8.2.1
>
>
>