From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: use vmalloc_node() for percpu scratches Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:48:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20131021144825.GA1509@secunet.com> References: <20131017095502.GD7660@secunet.com> <20131017130740.D8741E8A5E@unicorn.suse.cz> <20131018092512.GA31491@secunet.com> <1382093656.3284.14.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:38456 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752642Ab3JUOs2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:48:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1382093656.3284.14.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:54:16AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > > scratches are per cpu, we can use vmalloc_node() for proper > NUMA affinity. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Applied to ipsec-next, thanks a lot Eric!