From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PATCH resubmit] ax88179_178a: Correct the RX
 error definition in RX header
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 02:15:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20131022.021546.1648298758048784147.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1382406449-2041-1-git-send-email-freddy@asix.com.tw>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, allan@asix.com.tw, louis@asix.com.tw
To: freddy@asix.com.tw
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1382406449-2041-1-git-send-email-freddy@asix.com.tw>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org


Submit these, not individually as single patches, but as a patch set,
the first one with subject "[PATCH 1/2]" and the second with
subject "[PATCH 2/2]"

You have to do this, because it is absolutely essentially to let
me know which patch gets applies first and which one gets applied
second.  The two patches are to the same file, so if you don't
tell me the order, they won't apply cleanly at all.