From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: introduce new IP_MTU_DISCOVER mode IP_PMTUDISC_INTERFACE Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:07:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20131030200725.GB9093@order.stressinduktion.org> References: <20131026201158.GI15744@order.stressinduktion.org> <20131029.000844.1092862708536984032.davem@davemloft.net> <20131029120424.GD26185@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, fweimer@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from order.stressinduktion.org ([87.106.68.36]:39516 "EHLO order.stressinduktion.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753957Ab3J3UH1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:07:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131029120424.GD26185@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi! On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:04:25PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > I really tried hard to find alternatives or even a way to enable > the protection automatically given that at least unbound does apply > IP_PMTUDISC_DONT to its sockets already. These are the reasons why I > came up with the new IP_PMTUDISC_INTERFACE value: Sorry to bother you but I would really love to hear your feedback on my reasoning so I can try to come up with a solution you would be happy with. Thank you, Hannes