From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: codel: Avoid undefined behavior from signed overflow
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:53:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031225332.38534539@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383161748.1601.24.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:35:48 +0000
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 18:23 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <netoptimizer@brouer.com>
> >
> > As described in commit 5a581b367 (jiffies: Avoid undefined
> > behavior from signed overflow), according to the C standard
> > 3.4.3p3, overflow of a signed integer results in undefined
> > behavior.
> [...]
>
> According to the real processors that Linux runs on, signed arithmetic
> uses 2's complement representation and overflow wraps accordingly. And
> we rely on that behaviour in many places, so we use
> '-fno-strict-overflow' to tell gcc not to assume we avoid signed
> overflow. (There is also '-fwrapv' which tells gcc to assume the
> processor behaves this way, but shouldn't it already know how the target
> machine works?)
For 16-bit I have tested that is fails, and that it does not help to
use the compiler flag: '-fno-strict-overflow' or '-fwrapv'. (this was
userspace test code, so I might be missing some kernel compiler options
that would make this work for 16-bit, but I doubt it)
#define works_u16_time_after(a,b) \
(typecheck(u_int16_t, a) && \
typecheck(u_int16_t, b) && \
((int16_t)((b) - (a)) < 0))
#define bad_u16_time_after(a,b) \
(typecheck(u_int16_t, a) && \
typecheck(u_int16_t, b) && \
(((int16_t)(b) - (int16_t)(a)) < 0))
The bnx2x have a wrong/dangerup construct:
File: drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
#define SUB_S16(a, b) (s16)((s16)(a) - (s16)(b))
#define SUB_S32(a, b) (s32)((s32)(a) - (s32)(b))
I have tested this case, and it surprisingly works, due to the outer
(s16) cast I believe.
I think this should/could be fixed like:
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
index 4e01c57..8969733 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
@@ -838,8 +838,8 @@ static inline bool bnx2x_fp_ll_polling(struct bnx2x_fastpath *fp)
#define RCQ_TH_HI(bp) (RCQ_TH_LO(bp) + DROPLESS_FC_HEADROOM)
/* This is needed for determining of last_max */
-#define SUB_S16(a, b) (s16)((s16)(a) - (s16)(b))
-#define SUB_S32(a, b) (s32)((s32)(a) - (s32)(b))
+#define SUB_S16(a, b) (s16)((u16)(a) - (u16)(b))
+#define SUB_S32(a, b) (s32)((u32)(a) - (u32)(b))
#define BNX2X_SWCID_SHIFT 17
#define BNX2X_SWCID_MASK ((0x1 << BNX2X_SWCID_SHIFT) - 1)
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-30 17:23 [net-next PATCH] net: codel: Avoid undefined behavior from signed overflow Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-10-30 18:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-31 14:15 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-10-31 15:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-31 20:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-10-30 19:35 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-10-30 20:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-30 20:19 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-10-31 4:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-31 21:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131031225332.38534539@redhat.com \
--to=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).