netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: codel: Avoid undefined behavior from signed overflow
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:53:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031225332.38534539@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383161748.1601.24.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>

On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:35:48 +0000
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 18:23 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <netoptimizer@brouer.com>
> > 
> > As described in commit 5a581b367 (jiffies: Avoid undefined
> > behavior from signed overflow), according to the C standard
> > 3.4.3p3, overflow of a signed integer results in undefined
> > behavior.
> [...]
> 
> According to the real processors that Linux runs on, signed arithmetic
> uses 2's complement representation and overflow wraps accordingly.  And
> we rely on that behaviour in many places, so we use
> '-fno-strict-overflow' to tell gcc not to assume we avoid signed
> overflow.  (There is also '-fwrapv' which tells gcc to assume the
> processor behaves this way, but shouldn't it already know how the target
> machine works?)

For 16-bit I have tested that is fails, and that it does not help to
use the compiler flag: '-fno-strict-overflow' or '-fwrapv'. (this was
userspace test code, so I might be missing some kernel compiler options
that would make this work for 16-bit, but I doubt it)

#define works_u16_time_after(a,b)			\
	(typecheck(u_int16_t, a) &&		\
	 typecheck(u_int16_t, b) &&		\
	 ((int16_t)((b) - (a)) < 0))

#define bad_u16_time_after(a,b)			\
	(typecheck(u_int16_t, a) &&		\
	 typecheck(u_int16_t, b) &&		\
	 (((int16_t)(b) - (int16_t)(a)) < 0))


The bnx2x have a wrong/dangerup construct:

 File: drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
 #define SUB_S16(a, b)		(s16)((s16)(a) - (s16)(b))
 #define SUB_S32(a, b)		(s32)((s32)(a) - (s32)(b))

I have tested this case, and it surprisingly works, due to the outer
(s16) cast I believe.

I think this should/could be fixed like:

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
index 4e01c57..8969733 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
@@ -838,8 +838,8 @@ static inline bool bnx2x_fp_ll_polling(struct bnx2x_fastpath *fp)
 #define RCQ_TH_HI(bp)          (RCQ_TH_LO(bp) + DROPLESS_FC_HEADROOM)
 
 /* This is needed for determining of last_max */
-#define SUB_S16(a, b)          (s16)((s16)(a) - (s16)(b))
-#define SUB_S32(a, b)          (s32)((s32)(a) - (s32)(b))
+#define SUB_S16(a, b)          (s16)((u16)(a) - (u16)(b))
+#define SUB_S32(a, b)          (s32)((u32)(a) - (u32)(b))
 
 #define BNX2X_SWCID_SHIFT      17
 #define BNX2X_SWCID_MASK       ((0x1 << BNX2X_SWCID_SHIFT) - 1)


-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-31 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-30 17:23 [net-next PATCH] net: codel: Avoid undefined behavior from signed overflow Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-10-30 18:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-31 14:15   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-10-31 15:10     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-31 20:40       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-10-30 19:35 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-10-30 20:13   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-30 20:19     ` Ben Hutchings
2013-10-31  4:55       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-31 21:53   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131031225332.38534539@redhat.com \
    --to=jbrouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).