From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Flavio Leitner Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] RFC [PATCH 2/3] PTP: use flags to request HW features Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:34:19 -0200 Message-ID: <20131101013419.GH4202@plex.lan> References: <1383159637-8165-1-git-send-email-fbl@redhat.com> <1383159637-8165-3-git-send-email-fbl@redhat.com> <20131030214841.GZ13373@plex.lan> <20131031071256.GB5226@netboy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings To: Richard Cochran Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10459 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752412Ab3KABdl (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:33:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131031071256.GB5226@netboy> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 07:48:41PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 05:00:36PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > > Currently the user space can't tell which delay mechanism > > > (E2E/P2P) or transport is needed in the ioctl(). Therefore, > > > PTP silently fails when the hardware doesn't support a > > > certain delay mechanism or transport. > > [ For netdev readers, the text below repeats what I posted to the > linuxptp-devel list. ] I am reconsidering about extending ethtool instead, so I'd like to drop these patches for now. Thanks Richard and Jacob for the contributions, fbl