From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] ipv6: remove the destination condition on flow label sharing Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:40:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20131101214048.GD30284@order.stressinduktion.org> References: <1383322286-21464-1-git-send-email-florent.fourcot@enst-bretagne.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Florent Fourcot Return-path: Received: from order.stressinduktion.org ([87.106.68.36]:44101 "EHLO order.stressinduktion.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752130Ab3KAVkt (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:40:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1383322286-21464-1-git-send-email-florent.fourcot@enst-bretagne.fr> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Florent Fourcot wrote: > In case of label sharing, it should be possible to use > one label to more than one destination. This > old restriction is not mandatory, so we can remove it. Why? Maybe I am not the only one up to date with recent advances in flow label management but I guess others want to know why, too? Please reflect this in your changelog. Greetings, Hannes