From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfrm: use vmalloc_node() for percpu scratches Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 01:21:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20131102.012156.131372678670615938.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1383292257-4634-1-git-send-email-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> <1383292257-4634-2-git-send-email-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> <5273A67B.9070901@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:33738 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750918Ab3KBFV5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Nov 2013 01:21:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5273A67B.9070901@cogentembedded.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Sergei Shtylyov Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:02:51 +0400 >> @@ -220,8 +220,8 @@ static void ipcomp_free_scratches(void) >> >> static void * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void) >> { >> - int i; >> void * __percpu *scratches; >> + int i; > > This collateral change is not described in the changelog. Yes, but I'm not going to block this series just for this.