From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pablo@netfilter.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, mleitner@redhat.com,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, wensong@linux-vs.org,
horms@verge.net.au, ja@ssi.bg, edumazet@google.com,
pshelar@nicira.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 2/3] netfilter: ip6_tables: use reasm skb for matching
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:41:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131105134118.GA5818@macbook.localnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105133205.GC15370@breakpoint.cc>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:32:05PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
> > This patch fixes for example following situation:
> > On HOSTA do:
> > ip6tables -I INPUT -p icmpv6 -j DROP
> > ip6tables -I INPUT -p icmpv6 -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 128 -j ACCEPT
>
> untested:
>
> -A INPUT -p icmpv6 -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 128 -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p icmpv6 -m conntrack --ctstatus CONFIRMED -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p icmpv6 -j DROP
>
> > and on HOSTB you do:
> > ping6 HOSTA -s2000 (MTU is 1500)
> >
> > Incoming echo requests will be filtered out on HOSTA. This issue does
> > not occur with smaller packets than MTU (where fragmentation does not happen).
>
> Patrick, any reason not to kill the special-casing (ct has assigned helper or
> unconfirmed conntrack) in __ipv6_conntrack_in() ?
>
> This should make ipv6 frag behaviour consistent; right now its rather
> confusing from ruleset point of view, especially the first packet
> of a connection is always seen as reassembled.
>
> So with Jiris rules
>
> -A INPUT -p icmpv6 -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 128 -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p icmpv6 -j DROP
>
> ping6 -s $bignum works for the first packet but not for subsequent ones
> which is quite irritating.
Well, the reason was to avoid unnecessary work doing refragmentation
unless really required. I know its rather complicated, but IPv6 has
always required treating fragments manually or using conntrack state.
I'm not objecting to changing this, but the patches as they are are
not the way to go. First, moving nfct_frag to struct sk_buff seems
like a real waste of space for this quite rare case. Also, we can't
just use the reassembled packet in ip6tables, when modifying it we
will still output the unchanged fragments. An last of all, we'll be
executing the rules on the reassembled packet multiple times, one
for each fragment.
So if someone wants to change this, simply *only* pass the reassembled
packet through the netfilter hooks and drop the fragments, as in IPv4.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-05 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 11:02 [patch net-next 0/3] couple of reasm fixes Jiri Pirko
2013-11-05 11:02 ` [patch net-next 1/3] move skb_nfct_reasm into skbuff.h Jiri Pirko
2013-11-05 11:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2013-11-06 1:00 ` Simon Horman
2013-11-05 11:02 ` [patch net-next 2/3] netfilter: ip6_tables: use reasm skb for matching Jiri Pirko
2013-11-05 11:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2013-11-05 13:32 ` Florian Westphal
2013-11-05 13:41 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2013-11-05 15:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-11-05 15:39 ` Florian Westphal
2013-11-05 18:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2013-11-05 18:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-11-05 18:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2013-11-05 20:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-11-05 22:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2013-11-06 14:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-11-06 14:33 ` Florian Westphal
2013-11-06 14:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-11-06 14:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2013-11-06 15:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-11-06 16:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-05 11:02 ` [patch net-next 3/3] fix skb_morph to preserve skb->sk and skb->destructor pointers Jiri Pirko
2013-11-05 11:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2013-11-05 14:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-05 14:47 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131105134118.GA5818@macbook.localnet \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=pshelar@nicira.com \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).