From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: xen-netback regression in 3.10.18
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 15:57:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20131109.155705.1091114498622318881.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <527B8465.6050901@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	paul.durrant@citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
	wei.liu2@citrix.com
To: david.vrabel@citrix.com
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <527B8465.6050901@citrix.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:15:33 +0000

> 3.10.18 included 279f438e36c0 (xen-netback: Don't destroy the netdev
> until the vif is shut down) but this has a regression that was fixed by
> dc62ccaccfb1 (xen-netback: transition to CLOSED when removing a VIF)
> 
> dc62ccaccfb1 depends on ea732dff5cfa (xen-netback: Handle backend state
> transitions in a more robust way) which is also a bug fix for certain
> Windows frontend drivers and is thus also a stable candidate.
> 
> Dave can you ensure these two commits are tagged for the next 3.10.y
> stable release?
> 
>   ea732dff5cfa10789007bf4a5b935388a0bb2a8f
>   dc62ccaccfb139d9b04bbc5a2688a4402adbfab3

Ian already asked me to do this, and the commits are necessary for
3.11 -stable as well.

They've been queued up.