From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 0/2] ipv6: allow temporary address management for user-created addresses Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:01:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20131111.150152.1112137216301137879.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1384181359-23199-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <20131111.134243.26261596699898567.davem@davemloft.net> <20131111194901.GA2397@minipsycho.orion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, thaller@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, hannes@stressinduktion.org, vyasevich@gmail.com, dcbw@redhat.com To: jiri@resnulli.us Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:57292 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754081Ab3KKUB4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:01:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20131111194901.GA2397@minipsycho.orion> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jiri Pirko Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:49:01 +0100 > Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 07:42:43PM CET, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >> >>I'm not really going to read patches not properly at least CC:'d to >>netdev, sorry Jiri. > > netdev is in "To:" > > I marked the patches as "RFC" on patchwork. Maybe I should not do it > next time, right? I think you sent this multiple times, once without netdev in the CC: and then again with it present. In any event you did the right thing in the end, sorry about that :)