From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 0/2] ipv6: allow temporary address management for user-created addresses Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:49:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20131111194901.GA2397@minipsycho.orion> References: <1384181359-23199-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <20131111.134243.26261596699898567.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, thaller@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, hannes@stressinduktion.org, vyasevich@gmail.com, dcbw@redhat.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com ([74.125.83.51]:33432 "EHLO mail-ee0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753932Ab3KKTtF (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:49:05 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t10so2645330eei.38 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131111.134243.26261596699898567.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 07:42:43PM CET, davem@davemloft.net wrote: > >I'm not really going to read patches not properly at least CC:'d to >netdev, sorry Jiri. netdev is in "To:" I marked the patches as "RFC" on patchwork. Maybe I should not do it next time, right? Thanks Jiri