From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Veaceslav Falico Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/10] bonding: rebuild the lock use for bond monitor Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:26:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20131113092606.GG19702@redhat.com> References: <527C4768.3010909@huawei.com> <20131108.014550.886693705136672248.davem@davemloft.net> <1384298787.3802.59.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: David Miller , dingtianhong@huawei.com, fubar@us.ibm.com, andy@greyhouse.net, nikolay@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3792 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758185Ab3KMJ23 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:28:29 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1384298787.3802.59.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:26:27PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: >On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 01:45 -0500, David Miller wrote: >> Such patches should not be submitted at this time, the merge window >> has openned up and therefore the net-next tree is closed. >> >> Please wait for the merge window to close and the net-next tree >> to open back up before submitting these changes. > >These look like bug fixes that should have been submitted for the net >tree. I am not really sure that it's suitable for net tree, cause these aren't really bugfixes - but rather locking removal. It might fix/improve some situations - but the changes touch really sensitive parts and I think they should go through net-next, to brew a little. > >Ben. > >-- >Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare >Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. >They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. >