From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net/phy: Add VSC8234 support Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:09:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20131115.210921.1205089932014239868.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1384556305-17133-1-git-send-email-Shruti@Freescale.com> <20131115.205843.1202324001274425714.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Shruti@freescale.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, afleming@gmail.com, galak@kernel.crashing.org To: f.fainelli@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:32854 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753414Ab3KPCJX (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:09:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Florian Fainelli Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:04:36 -0800 > 2013/11/15 David Miller : >> >> These patches didn't actually make it to the netdev list, so they >> were not queued up in patchwork. > > Are you sure about them not making it to netdev? marc.info also has > the 4 of them here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=138455632228947&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=138455632828949&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=138455633228950&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=138455633628952&w=2 More specifically I meant that they didn't end up in patchwork, which is what actually matters for my workflow.