From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Michael Dalton <mwdalton@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lf-virt <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: fix page refcnt leaking when fail to allocate frag skb
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:00:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120090009.GC19341@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANJ5vP+ZxtDf8OzREpyDpgh8JLnWGEjkUcS388hi+AOjdu0fZw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:34:16PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After further reflection I think we're looking at two related issues:
> (a) a memory leak that Jason has identified that occurs when a memory
> allocation fails in receive_mergeable. Jasons commit solves this issue.
> (b) virtio-net does not dequeue all buffers for a packet in the
> case that an error occurs on receive and mergeable receive buffers is
> enabled.
>
> For (a), this bug is new and due to changes in 2613af0ed18a, and the
> net impact is memory leak on the physical page. However, I believe (b)
> has always been possible in some form because if page_to_skb() returns
> NULL (e.g., due to SKB allocation failure), receive_mergeable is never
> called. AFAICT this is also the behavior prior to 2613af0ed18a.
>
> The net impact of (b) would be that virtio-net would interpret a packet
> buffer that is in the middle of a mergeable packet as the start of a
> new packet, which is definitely also a bug (and the buffer contents
> could contain bytes that resembled a valid virtio-net header).
>
> A solution for (b) will require handling both the page_to_skb memory
> allocation failures and the memory allocation failures in
> receive_mergeable introduced by 2613af0ed18a.
>
> Best,
>
> Mike
Absolutely. I missed this fact yesterday night but I can see it clearly
in the morning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-19 8:05 [PATCH net] virtio-net: fix page refcnt leaking when fail to allocate frag skb Jason Wang
2013-11-19 14:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 18:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-19 20:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-19 21:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 21:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-19 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 1:34 ` Michael Dalton
2013-11-20 3:17 ` Jason Wang
2013-11-20 9:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-11-20 8:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-20 15:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 16:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-20 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 17:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-19 21:38 ` Michael Dalton
2013-11-20 9:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-20 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2013-11-20 3:00 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131120090009.GC19341@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwdalton@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).