From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michele Baldessari Subject: Re: Bug - regression - Via velocity interface coming up freezes kernel Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:28:49 +0000 Message-ID: <20131123182849.6d742f82@fante.int.rhx> References: <20130922221109.GA14246@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20131111234656.GA4846@marquez.int.rhx> <20131114072451.GA2313@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20131115000113.GA22051@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dirk Kraft , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall To: Francois Romieu Return-path: Received: from palahniuk.acksyn.org ([5.9.7.26]:43406 "EHLO palahniuk.acksyn.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755539Ab3KWS2w (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:28:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20131115000113.GA22051@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Francois, On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 01:01:13 +0100 Francois Romieu wrote: > Francois Romieu : > > Michele Baldessari : > > [...] > > > any chance you can submit this officially ? > > > > Yes. > > > > > Or does this patch need some more work ? > > > > I'll write some narrative for the commit message. > > I would actually rather send the patch below. > > The previous patch isn't safe against mtu changes. Please give the > patch below some testing. Test case: receive lots of packets while > changing MTU. Loop. The former patch may crash. The later shouldn't. testing was performed by Alex A. Schmidt on this second patch variant with MTU changes and no crashes were observed. Is the patch good to go now? thanks, Michele