Re: [Patch v2] IPv6: Fixed support for blackhole and prohibit routes

[Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>]

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 01:51:28PM +0530, Kamala R wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index f54e3a1..d90b9ab 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -1564,21 +1564,24 @@ int ip6_route_add(struct fib6_config *cfg)
>  				goto out;
>  			}
>  		}
> -		rt->dst.output = ip6_pkt_discard_out;
> -		rt->dst.input = ip6_pkt_discard;
>  		rt->rt6i_flags = RTF_REJECT|RTF_NONEXTHOP;
> +		rt->dst.error = -ENETUNREACH;
>  		switch (cfg->fc_type) {
>  		case RTN_BLACKHOLE:
>  			rt->dst.error = -EINVAL;
> +			rt->dst.output = dst_discard;
> +			rt->dst.input = dst_discard;
>  			break;
>  		case RTN_PROHIBIT:
>  			rt->dst.error = -EACCES;
> +			rt->dst.output = ip6_pkt_prohibit_out;
> +			rt->dst.input = ip6_pkt_prohibit;
>  			break;
>  		case RTN_THROW:
>  			rt->dst.error = -EAGAIN;
> -			break;
>  		default:
> -			rt->dst.error = -ENETUNREACH;
> +			rt->dst.output = ip6_pkt_discard_out;
> +			rt->dst.input = ip6_pkt_discard;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		goto install_route;

I like it more if a variable is only assigned once. Otherwise it is fine by
me.