From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Veaceslav Falico Subject: Re: [bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org: [Bug 66111] New: after this message ipv4 bond0 working i no try ipv6 not have this time] Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:37:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20131129123749.GA5781@redhat.com> References: <20131129110828.GO4118@order.stressinduktion.org> <5298886D.8090400@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Nikolay Aleksandrov Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3512 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752767Ab3K2MkT (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:40:19 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rATCeIIw031676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:40:19 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5298886D.8090400@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 01:28:29PM +0100, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: >On 11/29/2013 12:08 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: >> ----- Forwarded message from bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org ----- >> >> From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org >> To: hannes@stressinduktion.org >> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:24:12 +0000 >> Subject: [Bug 66111] New: after this message ipv4 bond0 working i no try >> ipv6 not have this time >> Message-ID: >> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66111 >> >> Bug ID: 66111 >> Summary: after this message ipv4 bond0 working i no try ipv6 >> not have this time >> Product: Networking >> Version: 2.5 >> Kernel Version: Linux 12terr 3.12.1 #1 SMP Thu Nov 28 20:32:48 EET >> 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> Hardware: x86-64 >> OS: Linux >> Tree: Mainline >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P1 >> Component: IPV6 >> Assignee: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org >> Reporter: korvin2000@gmail.com >> Regression: No >> >> [ 8.449805] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth2 as an active interface with an up >> link. >> [ 8.633226] RTNL: assertion failed at drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c (3398) >> [ 8.633303] CPU: 0 PID: 2007 Comm: rpcbind Tainted: G O 3.12.1 #1 >> [ 8.633306] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/F2A85-V, >> BIOS 5023 10/29/2012 >> [ 8.633309] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff81347bc5 >> ffff880429ed5000 >> [ 8.633314] ffffffffa0106ea2 ffff880429ed5000 0000000000000000 >> ffff880429ed5000 >> [ 8.633318] ffffffff81297d35 0000000000000001 ffff88042994bc80 >> ffff88042cd45e4c >> [ 8.633321] Call Trace: >> [ 8.633331] [] ? dump_stack+0x41/0x51 >> [ 8.633340] [] ? bond_set_rx_mode+0x2d/0xa7 [bonding] >> [ 8.633345] [] ? __dev_mc_add+0x48/0x59 >> [ 8.633351] [] ? igmp6_group_added+0x79/0x1a6 >> [ 8.633355] [] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xbc/0xcb >> [ 8.633359] [] ? ipv6_dev_mc_inc+0x20e/0x236 >> [ 8.633363] [] ? ipv6_sock_mc_join+0x116/0x171 >> [ 8.633369] [] ? do_ipv6_setsockopt.isra.6+0x8ee/0xc76 >> [ 8.633373] [] ? dev_name_hash.isra.59+0x20/0x35 >> [ 8.633377] [] ? dev_get_by_name_rcu+0x31/0x52 >> [ 8.633383] [] ? __inode_wait_for_writeback+0x67/0xae >> [ 8.633388] [] ? wake_atomic_t_function+0x21/0x21 >> [ 8.633393] [] ? fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode+0xa0/0x10e >> [ 8.633396] [] ? kmem_cache_free+0x32/0xbf >> [ 8.633401] [] ? dentry_kill+0x13d/0x148 >> [ 8.633405] [] ? dput+0xe5/0xef >> [ 8.633410] [] ? ipv6_setsockopt+0x4f/0x97 >> [ 8.633415] [] ? SyS_setsockopt+0x80/0xab >> [ 8.633418] [] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >> [ 8.907232] RPC: Registered named UNIX socket transport module. >> [ 8.907237] RPC: Registered udp transport module. >> [ 8.907239] RPC: Registered tcp transport module. >> [ 8.907241] RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module. >> >Hm, I believe this should be fixed by commit >b32418705107265dfca5edfe2b547643e53a732e ("bonding: RCUify bond_set_rx_mode()"). >$ git tag --contains b32418705107265dfca5edfe2b547643e53a732e >v3.13-rc1 Yep, indeed, commented on that BZ already. > >Nik