From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: r8169 - it's dead jim Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:18:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20131130221801.GA19790@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20131124005022.GA6299@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <5296C072.4070000@nurealm.net> <20131130203931.GA18929@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20131130.160629.2435326869658907.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: james@nurealm.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from violet.fr.zoreil.com ([92.243.8.30]:42107 "EHLO violet.fr.zoreil.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750908Ab3K3WSI (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:18:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131130.160629.2435326869658907.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller : [...] > Francois should I apply this or are you just posting this to get > testing feedback? No, it's only debuging help and testing feedback straight from format-patch. If I don't send fixes as "[PATCH net x/y] r8169: ..." or features as "[PATCH net-next 1/1] r8169: perform Tx completion before Rx processing" during the net-next window in self-contained messages, you should consider that nothing is expected to be applied and something is probably going wrong. -- Ueimor