From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dingtianhong@huawei.com
Cc: gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, joe@perches.com,
vfalico@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: neighbour: add neighbour dead check for neigh_timer_handler()
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:21:22 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131203.232122.852236751455974887.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <529EA9CF.2090008@huawei.com>
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:04:31 +0800
> The destroying neigh could be trigger by userspace, just like set the ip address which
> in arp table to the local device ip, some I could not control it, it maybe anytime,
> but the timer handler is execute by logic, this is normal, so I think the logic
> is no problem, and the process of destroying neigh may conflict with the timer handler,
> it is a synchronous problem to make sure the timer should be finished before the
> reference neigh is freed.
The more I think about this, the more none of the explanations for this bug
make any sense.
neigh_destroy() _ONLY_ runs when:
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&neigh->refcnt))
triggers in neigh_release().
This means it triggers if, and only if, neigh_refcnt goes to zero.
If the refcnt goes to zero, NO TIMER can be running. If the timer is
running, then there refcnt must be at least '1'.
The only plausible theory would be that something is releasing a neigh
too early, when references to the neigh still actually exist.
And that's a bug that should be fixed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-04 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-03 13:48 [PATCH net] net: neighbour: add neighbour dead check for neigh_timer_handler() Ding Tianhong
2013-12-03 15:03 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-04 1:36 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-03 16:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-04 1:59 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-03 16:37 ` David Miller
2013-12-04 2:37 ` Gao feng
2013-12-04 4:04 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-04 4:21 ` David Miller [this message]
2013-12-04 6:19 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-04 6:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-04 9:16 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-04 10:10 ` Gao feng
2013-12-04 15:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-05 0:32 ` Gao feng
2013-12-05 3:17 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-18 6:37 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-18 7:51 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-18 8:19 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-18 8:41 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-18 8:57 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-18 9:28 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-18 10:02 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-18 10:21 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-18 11:57 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-18 14:27 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-18 15:12 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-18 15:46 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-19 3:32 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-04 6:36 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131203.232122.852236751455974887.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).