netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Christophe Gouault <christophe.gouault@6wind.com>,
	network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Saurabh Mohan <saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vti: remove GRE_KEY flag for vti tunnel
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:47:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131205094708.GQ1258@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131205084727.GT31491@secunet.com>

On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:46:40PM +0100, Christophe Gouault wrote:
> > Hello Hangbin,
> > 
> > vti interfaces precisely need an o_key to be configured (it must be set
> > to the mark of ipsec policies attached to this interface). Consequently,
> > this flag must not be removed.
> > 
> 
> Why do we need to set these flags in vti_tunnel_ioctl()? All we do
> here, is to cheat userspace. The userspace should set these flags
> to configure the tunnel. Please note that we completely ignore
> the flags from userspace, instead we set our own flags.
> 
> I think the only reason why we set these flags here, is to make iproute2
> to print the i_key/o_key.
> 
> I've already metntioned that I'am a bit disappointed on how the gre
> keys and flags are used with vti. But I fear we need to keep it
> as it is for now, because it would at least change the behaviour
> of iproute2 if we remove the flags.

I submit this patch just beacuse iproute2 will return fail when we modify vti
parameters. Code here

ip/iptunnel.c#L226:
        if (p->iph.protocol == IPPROTO_IPIP || p->iph.protocol == IPPROTO_IPV6) {
                if ((p->i_flags & GRE_KEY) || (p->o_flags & GRE_KEY)) {
                        fprintf(stderr, "Keys are not allowed with ipip and sit tunnels\n");
                        return -1;
                }
        }

So should we modify iproute2 or kernel code?
-- 

Thanks & Best Regards
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-05  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-04  8:48 [PATCH] vti: remove GRE_KEY flag for vti tunnel Hangbin Liu
2013-12-04 12:46 ` Christophe Gouault
2013-12-05  8:47   ` Steffen Klassert
2013-12-05  9:47     ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2013-12-05 10:51       ` Steffen Klassert
2013-12-05 16:15         ` Hangbin Liu
2013-12-05  9:47   ` Hangbin Liu
2013-12-05 10:58     ` Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131205094708.GQ1258@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=christophe.gouault@6wind.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).