From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH] vti: remove GRE_KEY flag for vti tunnel Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:51:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20131205105143.GU31491@secunet.com> References: <1386146917-2951-1-git-send-email-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <529F2430.9050906@6wind.com> <20131205084727.GT31491@secunet.com> <20131205094708.GQ1258@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christophe Gouault , network dev , Cong Wang , Saurabh Mohan To: Hangbin Liu Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:53917 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752475Ab3LEKvq (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 05:51:46 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131205094708.GQ1258@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:47:08PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > > > I've already metntioned that I'am a bit disappointed on how the gre > > keys and flags are used with vti. But I fear we need to keep it > > as it is for now, because it would at least change the behaviour > > of iproute2 if we remove the flags. > > I submit this patch just beacuse iproute2 will return fail when we modify vti > parameters. Code here > > ip/iptunnel.c#L226: > if (p->iph.protocol == IPPROTO_IPIP || p->iph.protocol == IPPROTO_IPV6) { > if ((p->i_flags & GRE_KEY) || (p->o_flags & GRE_KEY)) { > fprintf(stderr, "Keys are not allowed with ipip and sit tunnels\n"); > return -1; > } > } > > So should we modify iproute2 or kernel code? Update iproute2 to allow GRE_KEY if the VTI_ISVTI flag is set. The handling of vti keys inside the kernel needs to be redesigned too, but this requires a concept such that the existing userspace API still works.