From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch net/stable v2] br: fix use of ->rx_handler_data in code executed on non-rx_handler path Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:16:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20131206.161627.917770459585726728.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1386257257-25258-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <20131206.154321.1673089712073824539.davem@davemloft.net> <20131206131028.41b5b8b1@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jtluka@redhat.com, zhiguohong@tencent.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, edumazet@google.com, laine@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com To: stephen@networkplumber.org Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:42620 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758136Ab3LFVQb (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:16:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20131206131028.41b5b8b1@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:10:28 -0800 > How come you ignored my simpler fix, that used the existing logic. > I don't like introducing this especially into the stable; much prefer > to go back to testing the flag as was being done before. I thought Jiri's response to your suggestion was adequate, that's all. I can revert and take your version if you want me to, just make a formal submission and get agreement from Jiri. Thanks.