netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Christian Grothoff <grothoff@in.tum.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	knock@gnunet.org, jacob@appelbaum.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP: add option for silent port knocking with integrity protection
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:23:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131212012317.GL21717@two.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A8ECF5.3070604@in.tum.de>

> ... and then do the same for the first TCP packet with payload? And you

That gets passed through by the firewall rule.

> seriously would consider that "safer" or "less error prone", starting

Yes the risk of adding exploitable holes to the kernel is signficantly
lower.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-12  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-10 18:35 [PATCH] TCP: add option for silent port knocking with integrity protection Christian Grothoff
2013-12-11 20:01 ` David Miller
2013-12-11 20:19   ` Christian Grothoff
2013-12-11 20:26     ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-12-11 20:39       ` Christian Grothoff
2013-12-11 21:25       ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-11 22:53         ` Christian Grothoff
2013-12-12  1:23           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2013-12-12 10:19             ` Jacob Appelbaum
2013-12-12 11:43               ` Christian Grothoff
2013-12-12 12:23                 ` Jacob Appelbaum
2013-12-12 14:34                 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-12 15:07                   ` Christian Grothoff
2013-12-12 15:33                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-12 15:46                   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-13  3:07                     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-08-19 19:36                   ` Alexander Holler
2014-08-20  8:24                     ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2014-08-20  9:07                       ` Alexander Holler
2014-08-20  9:28                         ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2014-08-20  9:47                           ` Alexander Holler
2014-08-20 10:20                             ` Alexander Holler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131212012317.GL21717@two.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grothoff@in.tum.de \
    --cc=jacob@appelbaum.net \
    --cc=knock@gnunet.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).