From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] tcp: use zero-window when free_space is low
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:51:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131216155158.GB3759@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387201280.19078.223.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Eric,
> On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 12:15 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Currently the kernel tries to announce a zero window when free_space
> > is below the current receiver mss estimate.
> >
> > When a sender is transmitting small packets, the receiver might be
> > unable to shrink the receive window, because
> > a) we cannot withdraw already-commited receive window, and,
> > b) we have to round the current rwin up to a multiple of the wscale factor,
> > else we would shrink the current window.
> >
> > This causes the receive buffer to fill up until the rmem limit is hit.
> > When this happens, we start dropping packets.
>
> I do not really understand the issue.
> Do you have a packetdrill test to demonstrate it ?
I am a moron and forgot to stress one crucial bit of information:
_slow_reader_ (or a reader that doesn't read from socket at all!)
I am not very familiar with packetdrill, it would look something like
0.000 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
0.100...0.200 connect(3, ..., ...) = 0
0.100 > S 0:0(0) <mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 100 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7>
0.200 < S. 0:0(0) ack 1 win 32792 <mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 100 ecr 100,nop,wscale 7>
0.200 > . 1:1(0) ack 1 <nop,nop,TS val 100 ecr 100>
0.300 write(3, ..., 23) = 23
0.310 write(3, ..., 23) = 23
0.320 write(3, ..., 23) = 23
0.330 write(3, ..., 23) = 23
0.340 write(3, ..., 23) = 23
0.350 write(3, ..., 23) = 23
.. repeat indefinitely ..
Reproducer (non-packetdrill):
On server:
$ nc -l -p 12345
<suspend it: CTRL-Z>
Client:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import socket
import time
sock = socket.socket()
sock.setsockopt(socket.IPPROTO_TCP, socket.TCP_NODELAY, 1)
sock.connect(("192.168.4.1", 12345));
while True:
sock.send('A' * 23)
time.sleep(0.005)
socket buffer on server-side will grow until tcp_rmem[2] is hit,
at which point the client rexmits data until -EDTIMEOUT.
Code flow on server side is:
tcp_data_queue -> tcp_try_rmem_schedule -> \
tcp_prune_queue -> tcp_clamp_window()
tcp_clamp_window will then grow sk->sk_rcvbuf, up until it eventually
hits tcp_rmem[2]
Many thanks for looking into this Eric!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-16 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-16 11:15 [PATCH next] tcp: use zero-window when free_space is low Florian Westphal
2013-12-16 13:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-16 15:51 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131216155158.GB3759@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).