netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: i386 vs x86_64 struct tpacket_hdr layout
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:38:54 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131220.133854.672157982782686878.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B4465E.2090904@aimvalley.nl>

From: Norbert van Bolhuis <nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:30:06 +0100

> 
> I'm compiling my 32bit application with -m32 on a x86_64
> system/kernel.
> 
> Things aren't working because for my application tp_len is at offset 4
> but for the kernel it is at offset 8.
> 
> struct tpacket_hdr {
>         unsigned long   tp_status;
>         unsigned int    tp_len;
>         unsigned int    tp_snaplen;
>         unsigned short  tp_mac;
>         unsigned short  tp_net;
>         unsigned int    tp_sec;
>         unsigned int    tp_usec;
> };
> 
> How is this suppose to work ?

This is why you should use tpacket layout v2 or v3, rather than v1,
they fix these issues.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-20 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-20 13:30 i386 vs x86_64 struct tpacket_hdr layout Norbert van Bolhuis
2013-12-20 18:38 ` David Miller [this message]
2013-12-20 18:45   ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-12-20 21:22     ` Norbert van Bolhuis
2014-01-06 22:58 ` single process receives own frames due to PACKET_MMAP Norbert van Bolhuis
2014-01-07  9:32   ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-01-07 10:06     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-01-07 13:16       ` Norbert van Bolhuis
2014-01-07 13:47         ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-01-07 14:09         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-01-07 15:16           ` Norbert van Bolhuis
2014-01-07 15:26             ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-01-07 15:46               ` Norbert van Bolhuis
2014-01-07 15:57                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-01-08 14:18                   ` Norbert van Bolhuis
2014-01-08 14:24                     ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-01-08 14:36                       ` Norbert van Bolhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131220.133854.672157982782686878.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).