From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:35:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20131223133526.GE18168@redhat.com> References: <1387239389-13216-1-git-send-email-mwdalton@google.com> <20131219.145815.1332595160898710763.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mwdalton@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, edumazet@google.com To: David Miller Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131219.145815.1332595160898710763.davem@davemloft.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:58:15PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > Can I get some reviews of this series from virtio folks? > > Thanks. I think it's a good idea, certainly the best we can do short term. Would like a couple of comments addressed before it's applied. Longer term one approach to consider is to make device look aheads in the VQ until it finds a large enough buffer. -- MST