From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: [patch iproute2 v2 0/2] add support for IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:29:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20140102172949.GF22494@order.stressinduktion.org> References: <1388676879-2603-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, thaller@redhat.com To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from order.stressinduktion.org ([87.106.68.36]:35582 "EHLO order.stressinduktion.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751574AbaABR3u (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:29:50 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1388676879-2603-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:34:37PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > v1->v2: Removed 0xff masking of ifa_flags > > Jiri Pirko (2): > add support for extended ifa_flags > add support for IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR > > include/linux/if_addr.h | 2 ++ > ip/ipaddress.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) I still wonder how source address selection should work for IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR if use_tempaddr != 2 mode is not available for those addresses. Up until now applications can bind to those addresses and traffic can be received for them, but there is now way how a user can specify to favor them in case of use_tempaddr == 0. Greetings, Hannes