From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: unify the pcpu_tstats and br_cpu_netstats Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 19:46:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20140103.194653.2008101352223130447.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20140103.193253.2226162174184357030.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:35445 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753866AbaADAqz (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2014 19:46:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Cong Wang Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:43:37 -0800 > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:32 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Cong Wang >> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 04:53:47 +0000 (UTC) >> >> This also means that since they are now an encapsulation thing we >> should rename them to pcpu_encap_stats or similar, thanks. > > Not sure "encap" makes sense for bridge too. Good point, perhaps the common thing is that they are all software devices in one sense or another. So "pcpu_sw_netstats".