From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] phy: kill excess code Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 16:42:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20140104154229.GE4925@netboy> References: <201401040413.06853.sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> <201401040419.14818.sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> <20140104073639.GB4261@netboy> <52C836EF.1010705@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Return-path: Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]:54080 "EHLO mail-ea0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754378AbaADPmk (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:42:40 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z10so7124262ead.20 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 07:42:39 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52C836EF.1010705@cogentembedded.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 07:29:35PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > Both kinds of empty lines are consistently avoided by all other > code I had to read. They don't really improve anything. But both your subject line and body talk about lines of code. Just removing blank lines is not the same as removing "excess code." Thanks, Richard