From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:00:50 -0500 Message-ID: <20140106200050.GG10885@tuxdriver.com> References: <1382819655-30430-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <1386494714-21070-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201312311047.30147@pali> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Luciano Coelho , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, freemangordon@abv.bg, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, pavel@ucw.cz, sre@ring0.de, joni.lapilainen@gmail.com, Johannes Berg , Felipe Contreras To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201312311047.30147@pali> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Pali Roh=E1r wrote: > On Sunday 08 December 2013 10:24:58 Pali Roh=E1r wrote: > > Hello, I'm sending wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree [1] for > > comments. More patches come from David's monitor & packet > > injection work. Patches are tested with 3.12 rc5 kernel on > > Nokia N900. > >=20 > > Second version contains new patch for fixing NULL pointer > > dereference which sometimes cause kernel panic and fixes code > > suggested by Pavel Machek. =20 > So far, there are no new comments for patches 01, 03-13 and 16.=20 > Are there any other problems with that patches or can be accepted=20 > for upstream? =20 They are probably fine to merge now. Of course, I was still deleting wl12xx patches when they were originally posted, so I'll need someone to resend the patches to me... John --=20 John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.