From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: Do not enable tx-nocache-copy by default Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:20:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20140107.162053.1127386147694253061.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20140106.200002.1747627391067832069.davem@davemloft.net> <1389107470-18213-1-git-send-email-bpoirier@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com To: bpoirier@suse.de Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:44814 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751350AbaAGVUz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:20:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1389107470-18213-1-git-send-email-bpoirier@suse.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Benjamin Poirier Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:11:10 -0500 > There are many cases where this feature does not improve performance = or even > reduces it. >=20 > For example, here are the results from tests that I've run using 3.12= =2E6 on one > Intel Xeon W3565 and one i7 920 connected by ixgbe adapters. The resu= lts are > from the Xeon, but they're similar on the i7. All numbers report the > mean=B1stddev over 10 runs of 10s. >=20 > 1) latency tests similar to what is described in "c6e1a0d net: Allow = no-cache > copy from user on transmit" > There is no statistically significant difference between tx-nocache-c= opy > on/off. > nic irqs spread out (one queue per cpu) ... > CC: Tom Herbert > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier Looks good, applied, thanks.