From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: wei.liu2@citrix.com
Cc: paul.durrant@citrix.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
david.vrabel@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] xen-netback: stop vif thread spinning if frontend is unresponsive
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 23:06:29 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140109.230629.123446421132170371.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108193716.GA16009@zion.uk.xensource.com>
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 19:37:16 +0000
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:41:58PM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> The recent patch to improve guest receive side flow control (ca2f09f2) had a
>> slight flaw in the wait condition for the vif thread in that any remaining
>> skbs in the guest receive side netback internal queue would prevent the
>> thread from sleeping. An unresponsive frontend can lead to a permanently
>> non-empty internal queue and thus the thread will spin. In this case the
>> thread should really sleep until the frontend becomes responsive again.
>>
>> This patch adds an extra flag to the vif which is set if the shared ring
>> is full and cleared when skbs are drained into the shared ring. Thus,
>> if the thread runs, finds the shared ring full and can make no progress the
>> flag remains set. If the flag remains set then the thread will sleep,
>> regardless of a non-empty queue, until the next event from the frontend.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
>> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
>> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Applied.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-08 12:41 [PATCH net-next v2] xen-netback: stop vif thread spinning if frontend is unresponsive Paul Durrant
2014-01-08 19:37 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-10 4:06 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140109.230629.123446421132170371.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox